SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (220409)2/22/2005 11:40:29 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586508
 
"Georgia and Texas are the only other states that restrict the distribution of sexual devices, according to the court record in the case."

Dunno about Georgia, but this is no great surprise. If you have ever had the time to read the Meese Commission Report, I warn you ahead of time that this sucker makes "War and Peace" look like a short story, you know that Texas, in particular Houston, has an obsession with "sexual devices". They reportedly had a warehouse, larger than a city block, stuffed solely with dildos. No doubt, they also have/had a similar warehouse with nipple clips and cock rings...

Not to mention leather goods.



To: SilentZ who wrote (220409)2/23/2005 12:27:02 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586508
 
>>> This is so screwed up and makes me so angry and ashamed to be an American today...

Oh, don't let it bother you. Just buy your vibrators through the mail. Or get a prescription for it.



To: SilentZ who wrote (220409)2/23/2005 2:29:40 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1586508
 
This is so screwed up and makes me so angry and ashamed to be an American today...

Court Rejects Appeal on Sex Toy Sales Ban


Alabama is somewhere around 1950. How can we be in the same country?

ted



To: SilentZ who wrote (220409)2/23/2005 2:34:33 AM
From: Elroy  Respond to of 1586508
 
The law prohibited the distribution of "any device designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs." First-time violators can face a fine of up to $10,000 and as much as one year in jail.

Wow! I've never heard of anything like this.

The appeals court said it agreed with Alabama that the law exercised time-honored use of state police power to restrict the sale of sex.

Interesting, it means the state government has the authority to restrict anything involving sex and money.

You've gotta wonder which legislator proposed the bill than banned the sale!



To: SilentZ who wrote (220409)2/24/2005 4:54:31 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1586508
 
I disagree with the law but I'm not sure this decision is wrong. It is certainly a bad law but its far from clear that it violates the constitution. It should be changed by the state legislature not the USSC.

Tim