Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (220478)	2/23/2005 9:45:44 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579107

Hillary is unelectable. I hope to God she does not run. I think it will be Hillary versus Jeb Bush in 2008. Jeb's major knock would be that the US doesn't want a dynastic leadership like they have in India, but running against Hillary that wouldn't be such a negative for obvious reasons. I'll bet that Hillary declares first, and as soon as she does Jeb declares, and then they are off....

To: neolib who wrote (220478)	2/23/2005 1:03:43 PM
From: Suma	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579107

I agree. And that's just because I know how the majority of those who post on these threads feel about her. She would put herself into a position to have pot shots taken of her all the time.. Who needs it. That being said, I think that she would do well as President. However too long a kite tail of her husband's dalliances and the rumors that persisted about all of those scandals(,none of which were ever substantiated after Starr did all those investigations.) will forever haunt her. It's easier to ruin a reputation than to ever make allegations of one go away.