SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (151562)2/23/2005 2:52:12 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Why would AMD use the exact same phrase as Intel?

BTW, IBM fabricated a 65nm SOI SRAM in late 2002.

12/04/2002, 4:30 PM ET

EAST FISHKILL, N.Y.--IBM Corp.'s Microelectronics Division next week is expected to announce a radical and combination strained-silicon/silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology for use in making high-performance chips at the 65-nm (0.065-micron) node.

IBM has already fabricated an SRAM, based on the "strained-silicon-on-SOI" technology in the lab, but commercial chip products are not due out until the 65-nm node in the 2005 time frame, according to officials from the East Fishkill-based organization.



To: Elmer Phud who wrote (151562)2/23/2005 4:49:23 PM
From: combjellyRespond to of 275872
 
"Did AMD specifically say fully functional?"

No, but then they never do. So this isn't some warning sign. For 180nm copper, they did mention doing an SRAM at one of the CCs, but nothing was ever said about it at 130nm. However, I am sure they did SRAMs on 130nm.



To: Elmer Phud who wrote (151562)2/23/2005 5:33:26 PM
From: brushwudRespond to of 275872
 
Did AMD specifically say fully functional [65 nm SRAMs]?

No, they said "yields are exceeding our development plans". So 65 nm SRAM yields must be greater than zero.