Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (158468)	2/24/2005 12:09:25 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Press Impostor ___________________ At the White House, don't duck the real questions Editorial The Detroit Free Press February 23, 2005 freep.com How is it that an administration that screened thousands of people for attendance at Bush campaign rallies repeatedly let a fake reporter into the sanctorum of the White House pressroom under a false name? Who was running that background check? How could a president who declares that national security is his prime concern be so ill served for nearly two years by his own security detail? What is the public to make of the fact that legitimate protesters are kept far away from President George W. Bush while an illegitimate "journalist" who's really working for a Republican propaganda mill is repeatedly allowed into the White House pressroom and regularly called upon by the president and the president's press secretary to ask questions? Is it possible that the administration's formidable public relations machine was well aware that reporter "Jeff Gannon" of the Talon News Web site was really James Guckert, and that Talon and the Web site GOPUSA have the same owner and often the same pro-Republican content? Is it possible that an administration that is so careful about scripting events and managing information approved of Guckert being planted in the pressroom to ask softball questions and even to keep an eye on the real reporters working there? Isn't that fair to ask, considering this is the same administration that used its taxpayer-funded, $250-million public relations apparatus to pay columnists to say nice things about its programs? Once Guckert was exposed, shouldn't the administration, for the sake of security and integrity, have run identity checks on the other members of the White House press corps? Are there any pseudo-reporters planted there from Democratic organizations to ask hard questions? Based on the Guckert case, can any self-styled journalist from an obscure Web site or blog expect to obtain a daily pass to attend White House press briefings? Given the proliferation of same, is the White House prepared for a stampede of applications? Will all identities be verified? Will reporters from GOP-friendly media receive preferred seating? Is anyone in the Bush administration asking these questions? Or interested in answering them?

To: jttmab who wrote (158468)	2/24/2005 5:26:30 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Respond to of 281500

blogosphere is a new animal that they will have some difficulty discrediting. Why should the Administration want to discredit the blogosphere? Most of the most effective blogs have set themselves up in opposition to he MSM message. That means these blogs are right of center. Look at the stories that the blogosphere broke in spite of MSM efforts to ignore them: The Swiftvets and John Kerry Dan Rather and the Forged Memos Eason Jordan Accusing US Troops of Targeting Journalists On the other hand, we have Guckert/Gannon got a daily press pass. Tell me, had you ever heard of Gannon before this "major scandal" occurred? Me neither.