Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Diamond Play Cafi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chas. who wrote (2534)	2/25/2005 11:12:43 AM
From: james flannigan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16206

Chuck, my logic may be flawed,but i invest by mathamatics.This has kept me from making money on Bre-X,Enron,MCI,The internet bubble of 99,Ballard power, Nortel ala 2000,and SGF now just to name a few.If you were smart enough to make money off these as well as SGF,have one on me.Logic!!!! has kept me in the game over the past 15yrs and a little richer to.BTW John Kaiser just put a sell on SGF.I wounder if he stayed away from Nortel as well. Happy investing, I hope you make money over the long run, James

To: Chas. who wrote (2534)	2/25/2005 11:31:27 AM
From: VAUGHN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16206

Chuck If SGF were a US car company selling lemons, the US version of Consumer Corporate Affairs would force every unit to be recalled. Further, if the SGF car company could be proven to have knowingly sold lemons advertized as $1,350 Aston Martins', they would be convicted for perpetrating a fraud and their corporate officers thrown in the klink either by the feds and certainly by ES. On the other hand, for reasons best known to Howe Street embezzlers and the TSE, it is legal for you to buy worthless shares for a $1.50 per and sell them to greedy or foolish people for $5.50 per on the basis of caveat emptor. In short, legal fraud or if you prefer sanctioned corrupt capitalism. "If they're too stupid to crunch the numbers,... that's their problem!" "What's wrong" with it? Hey,... it's legal and you made a buck so it's OK... right!? The saddest thing of all is that you and the thousands like you have absolutely no problem sleeping at night... The world we live in. Vaughn

To: Chas. who wrote (2534)	2/26/2005 11:41:24 AM
From: Famularo	Respond to of 16206

From Brokerage Orion The much anticipated average value per carat has arrived. The Star Diamond value per carat is $110/ct, with an average modeled value of $135/ct – this is higher than our expectations of $105/ct. · The average ‘modeled’ value of $135/ct is the midpoint of the estimated range of $110/ct-$162/ct. This is based on a statistical model that estimates the average value of diamonds to be recovered from the mine based on proportion of large stones. · With the diamond values in hand, a pre-feasibility study is next. The study will aim to determine the economic parameters of the project, along with further exploration and environmental baseline studies. · At $135/ct, our NAV estimate increases by 79%. Using the $135/ct value as our new base mode increases our NAV value for the Star Diamond Mine (at 10% discount) to C$689 million from C$385 million. As a result of the increased NAV, we are adjusting our target price as well. We are increasing our target to C$11.00 from C$6.55. · We reiterate our Overweight (Speculative) recommendation. Summary and Investment Outlook Shore Gold released the diamond parcel value for the Star kimberlite on Wednesday, February 23. We had expected this to be a defining moment for the Star project – if the diamond value had come in materially below the $100/ct mark we believe the potential returns on the project might not have justified Shore going to the next stage of evaluation for this large, but low-grade, diamond deposit. In the event, the estimated value exceeded our expectations. The company reported that the value of the 3,050 carat parcel was $110/carat, based on the average of four valuations provided by different groups. The groups included WWW International (which acts as the government diamond valuator for the NWT), R. Steinmetz and Sons (affiliated with Shore Gold shareholder Magma Diamonds), and the diamond marketing groups of global mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton. The four groups produced a consistent picture. As is common in the diamond world, the groups responsible for the valuations are not keen to be associated with a specific value. However, we do understand that all four estimates were very close, with the difference between the high and low estimates within 6%. The modeled value is key. Even with a 3,000 carat parcel it is likely that large diamonds are underrepresented in the diamonds sent in for appraisal. As a result Shore, in common with other companies evaluating diamond projects (e.g. Tahera, De Beers) uses modeled values. The models are empirical, and intended to more accurately reflect the value of stones recovered during commercial scale mining. The modeled values were provided by WWW. This group, in addition to its role as government valuator, has extensive experience in evaluation of diamonds and diamond projects. Undoubtedly Rio Tinto and BHP have the capability of making similar estimates, but these were not within the scope of their involvement with Shore. The $135/carat is the best estimate for revenue for Star. The range of modeled values was from $110/ct to as much as $162/ct. Even with 3,000 carats recovered there were only 33 stones greater than 5 carats. The company intends (as we discuss below) to increase the scope of the bulk-sampling program to obtain more large diamonds to better tie down the values of the stones. An additional 10,000 tonnes will be mined. Shore would ideally like to see a recovered parcel of 6,000 carats to obtain better representation of large stones, and to reduce the “error bars” around the modeled value. What Does All This Mean for Shore? In our view, these data strongly support the idea of an economic diamond deposit at Star. In our view, the grade/diamond value combination suggests that a profitable mine can be developed at Star. By our estimate (using cost forecasts detailed in our February 9, 2005, initiation report) the project has the potential to provide an after-tax IRR in excess of 30%. What Is It Worth? Wednesday’s data was a huge step forward in assessing Star. We previously published tables that gave indicated IRRs and project NPVs at different diamond prices (as well as sensitivities to the US$/C$ rate and diamond grade). We have now inserted the modeled $135/ct value into our model and the results are as shown below (see Exhibit 1 and 2). We remind readers that, by our estimates, Canadian diamond producer Aber is trading at essentially its 0% NAV. In our view this represents the maximum potential upside for Shore – the 10% discounted NAV we employ for our target is a reasonable reflection (in our view) of what De Beers paid during its hostile bid for Winspear Resources in 2000. Exhibit 1. Orion Target Price (previous, using $105/ct) Star NPV (10%) - 15cpht, $105/ct ($MM) $385.0 FD Working Capital ($MM) $53.6 TOTAL ($MM) $438.6 Shares FD (MM) 81.7 NAV/sh ($C) $6.55 Source: Orion Securities Exhibit 2. Orion Target Price (current, using $135/ct) Star NPV (10%) - 15cpht, $135/ct ($MM) $690.0 FD Working Capital ($MM) $53.6 TOTAL ($MM) $743.6 Shares FD (MM) 81.7 NAV/sh ($C) $11.00 Source: Orion Securities Summary and Conclusions With these data we are more confident that a diamond mining industry will emerge in Saskatchewan. Shore Gold has been a “discovery in slow motion” – the available data have pointed to the likelihood of a mine since we first saw the project three years ago. It has taken the company three years – working at a pace that put many other projects to shame – to reach this point. With an aggressive project through the third quarter (and possibly beyond) Shore will have an immensely better understanding of the project by year-end. We continue to rate Shore Gold an Overweight (Speculative), but we haveraised our target price to C$11.00 (see our note of February 23) to reflect the better-than-expected diamond values.