Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kech who wrote (102178)	2/25/2005 11:08:23 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793955

the context of point 2 is important. I take your point that point 2 was was ranked lower than point one by Summers. But the reaction to point 2 was not where it fit into Summers' hierarchy but that it was mentioned at all. If someone makes three points and you have a problem with one of them, you react to that one. The rest is peripheral. Maybe a more dispassionate response would have displayed the courtesy of acknowledging him for two good points out of three before jumping all over him for the miss, but the miss was issue.