Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (673422)	2/25/2005 7:28:08 PM
From: goldworldnet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

How about Rick Santorum? * * *

To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (673422)	2/25/2005 8:28:52 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

War Is Heck Cussing by soldiers is far from the most shocking thing on television. Friday, February 25, 2005 12:01 a.m. PBS caused a stir last week when it told the producers of the "Frontline" series to bleep a handful of expletives in a documentary about U.S. troops in Iraq. In the original version of "A Company of Soldiers," some men could be heard cursing when their convoy came under fire from insurgents, and PBS worried that a particular word could get everyone in trouble with the FCC. In the end, at least 39 public television stations decided to go ahead Tuesday night with an unedited version of the documentary, although some stations moved the broadcast from 9 p.m. to a later hour. As of yesterday, they had no cause to regret their decision. In this rare instance, that's probably how it should be. War is never pretty, and bad language is the least of it. In the documentary, the curses underline the alarm and fear among men literally fighting for their lives. What makes this minor flap notable is that it occurred in a week when much more shocking, and arguably more gratuitous, things could be seen on network TV. In the genre of pure entertainment, for instance, CBS offered an episode of "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation" that plumbed new depths, even for that graphic show. Called "King Baby," it had a plot about adult infantilism, in which a middle-aged man acted out his erotic fantasies of returning to babyhood. There is no way to describe the practices this entailed without being revolting. To give only a few examples, the show zoomed in on human excrement and dirty diapers, and lingered over the role and products of a wet nurse. Over on NBC, meanwhile, an episode of "Medical Investigation" titled "Half Life" opened with shots of severed limbs and featured a lion, its muzzle red with blood, gnawing on what looked like a human leg. It proved pretty irrelevant to the plot, but what the heck, where else are you going to get a quick kick like that except on TV? Ditto, in a way, the references to the sexual practices of vampire fans and demented swingers in recent episodes of NBC's "Law & Order: Criminal Intent." Our point here is not that the FCC should go gunning for such shows. Actually, the FCC has no mandate to patrol the airwaves. The agency springs into investigative action only when members of the public file complaints, and even then it holds the bar pretty high. In general you really have to try hard and be relentlessly vile to push its buttons. However important the FCC's role--say, in trying to protect children from assaults on their innocence--it can't protect adults from themselves. If they want to peer at mutilated bodies and explore the corridors of human depravity, even in realms once inhabited only by incipient serial killers, that is their choice. Quite apart from its insalubrious aspects, "CSI" is an intricately plotted and well-acted show, though these attributes alone probably did not propel it to the top of the ratings. All the same, the needle on the shock-o-meter never stands still. What titillates people this week will not have the same effect next year. Whatever comes next, we suspect that it will make a few bad words uttered by soldiers look quaint by comparison.

To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (673422)	2/25/2005 9:50:05 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Rudy Giuliani, former mayor of New York - YUCK! But his is popular. How many REpublicans would stay home? George Pataki, governor of New York - YUCK! If he won New york, how could Democrats win? Mike Huckabee, governor of Arkansas - "President Huckabee?" Uh...I don't think so. Better than President Finn. Haley Barbour, governor of Mississippi - YUCK! He has gotten tort reform passed. It saved Mississippi from certain death. Mark Sanford, governor of South Carolina - Hmmmm. Not sure. I think he is respected in the state. George Voinovich, U.S. senator from Ohio and former governor -Hmmm. Possibly. Ok. J.C. Watts, former U.S. representative from Oklahoma - Hmmm. Need to see more of him. Dig up old Oklahoma football footage. He appeared for a few years. Opposing teams wished he would disappear. He is plain spoken and appears to be honorable. Elizabeth Dole, U.S. senator from North Carolina - Need to see more of her. I suspect she is at the peak of her career. She did fine as head of Red Cross. Thank goodness she went home to take the Senate seat. Bob Ehrlich, governor of Maryland - YUCK! Ernie Fletcher, governor of Kentucky - Hmmm. Need to see more of him. John McCain, U.S. senator from Arizona and 2000 nomination candidate - YUCK! He is welcome to come play hide and seek. He can hide first and I hope he hides real good. Jeb Bush, governor of Florida (done in 2007)Has said he will not seek the nomination - The best bet, if he mirrors his brother. He is a good solid performer. And the Democrats should just crawl out of their skin over his candidacy. Mitt Romney, governor of Massachusetts. Has said he will not run for president - YUCK!