Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (673454)	2/27/2005 11:43:36 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Respond to of 769670

Enforcing the law is reactionary? Do you scream when a township puts up cameras? In many communities thy issue tickets for running red lights based on pictures at stoplights taken using a simple program. They are transmitted to the central office and a ticket is mailed out. Why would it be reactionary to expect people to prove they have a right to vote? Suggesting a poll tax would be reactionary. The basic standard applied at the beginning of our republic was property ownership. Matching addresses to residents would be a reasonable standard. Democrats would probably resist because it would make their cheating more difficult. Motivated people will think of ways to cheat regardless of hoe many obstacles you place in their way. Let’s put up a few basic obstacles. Otherwise there will be more votes from ineligible voters than from people who have the right.