Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (102434)	2/27/2005 10:16:04 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793797

Competition in health works Adam Smith Institute Blog By Eamonn on Health In London Airport the way to the Adam Smith Institute's "Future of European Rail" conference in Rome, I've a short wait so I devour the free newspapers left out by those nice people at British Airways. And in the robustly anti-free-market Observer, I spot a headline story that private-sector radiology scans, contracted out to the private sector by the state-run NHS, have experienced lots of delays which have, of course, inconvenienced NHS patients. Does this prove that only state healthcare can actually deliver? Hardly. The very reason why the NHS is now contracting out so much -- X-rays, hip operations, replacement corneas, you name it -- is because the private sector is doing such a good job for it. Some providers, especially those from overseas who haven't been corrupted by our lackadaisical way of delivering healthcare, are showing that they can do the same procedures as the NHS but eight times cheaper, and faster too. The radiology problem is that X-ray pictures have been sent overseas for analysis, where language difficulties and other snags have caused delays. Of course, the NHS would never have dreamt of using overseas labour itself; the unions would never have allowed it. And no doubt the supplier will overcome these snags: it's still early days, after all. And there's another crucial point. If the NHS thinks its suppliers are failing, it can go to someone else. That alone should be enough to keep suppliers on their toes. You don't get that kind of useful pressure in the parts of the NHS that are still run by the government and delivered by public-sector monopoly staff.

To: LindyBill who wrote (102434)	2/27/2005 10:28:42 AM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 793797

Thanks, I missed that.

To: LindyBill who wrote (102434)	2/27/2005 11:18:26 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793797

The 9th Amendment is coming back in style. It really shoots down the "original intent" argument that the SCOTUS is making up things that are not in the Constitution, like the right to privacy. Well, yeah, they may not be enumerated but that doesn't mean they never existed before. Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. A harder question is, if the Constitution doesn't enumerate rights, how can the SCOTUS protect them? And my answer is, if not the SCOTUS, whom?