Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (10140)	2/27/2005 12:51:42 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Respond to of 20039

NEW PENTAGON ATTACK WEBSITE: pentagonresearch.com [RGD: The premise of this website seems quite reasonable. I agree completely with the author that the Dept. of Defense could end 3 1/2 years of conspiracy speculation by simply showing about 1 minute of survellaince video. I really have to wonder why we've never had this story put to rest. The Kean-Zelikow Commission clearly engaged in creating a mythology about AA77 and the Pentagon, and left us with more questions than answers.] <COPY> INTRODUCTION Why investigate 9/11? The simple answer is because the current administration has failed to do so. The official investigation has been handled poorly by any standards. I understand that lives have been changed by these events and intend nothing but respect for the passengers and crew of Flight 77, the Pentagon workers and their families. It is my goal to present as much observational information as possible to assist in the process of determining what happened that day. Realize that the Pentagon could release 60 seconds of video from a multitude of surveillance cameras and put this to rest in one news broadcast. No more speculation or conspiracy theories, but most of all, closure for the families. It is the administration's choice not to provide American citizens with the complete facts. The information on this website will mostly be represented in photographs and documented quotes. I've attempted to determine the time and location of events on the Pentagon grounds. I have also done my best to identify the photographers for each photo. On the Scene Map page you will see a location guide to important elements of the incident. There will be a few photos here some people haven't seen before. For my photo use policy you can check the Photo Use page. I will warn you in advance that I will appear to contradict myself, or more accurately the evidence will contradict itself. I will present alternative points-of-view to my own conclusions. I can assure you my disposition is to understand the evidence as it is. It would be a relief to have all of my questions answered and to understand this. On the other hand, I believe there is much more to this incident than a terrorist attack on our nation with no other factors involved. Keep in mind that my goal is to provide a tool that other researchers can use and evolve into a more comprehensive picture when all is said and done. To be honest with you, I myself am confused by what I see. You will see plenty of evidence to support the official story. You will also see many anomalies that make it difficult to believe the official story. I've tried to present both fairly. Hopefully the questions raised here will produce answers or stimulate you to continue your own research. If you read this and have insights, new information, or photos of your own that can assist in the investigation, I encourage you to share them. If you can prove something here that I've missed like what caused the exit hole, I'll post your article on that page and give you credit or leave you anonymous depending on your wishes. Sometimes in a chaotic circumstance it's best to think of how the events might have unfolded. This story could have been a news article about a terrorist plot that was thwarted by Intelligence. Then it could have been the capture of several of the 19 alleged hijackers on four separate flights at three different international airports. Or it could have been an interception of the aircraft by NORAD (Flight 93 is the only plane that didn't make its target). After the fact, there should have been an immediate investigation into all four events in a public forum. Every detail of what happened would have been forensically determined and publicized without any threat to national security. Then all of the lessons could be implemented to protect future generations from similar tragedy. In reality there was no government intervention prior to the attacks. There are no NTSB, FAA, or FBI accident reports on any of the four planes. The 9/11 Commission was delayed over 2 years and the evidence from WTC and the Pentagon was mostly destroyed prior to the reports that do exist. Nobody has been held accountable and Osama Bin Laden is still at large. What we did get are volumes of new laws that violate our Constitutional rights and the invasion of two countries with over one thousand additional Americans killed and thousands more injured. How did this happen? This is where I begin my piece of the investigation. I've decided to focus strictly on the Pentagon attack. There are many great sites out there that look into the various aspects of 9/11. You will find a few throughout this site (all links on this site will open in a separate window). We'll start with the Boeing 757-200, look at the Pentagon's structure in the impact area, and venture above Washington D.C. to analyze the attack path. After that we'll look at the the photographic evidence on the ground and follow the debris trail to the exit hole. For people new to this subject it may be useful to go through this site sequentially. The information on this site will change and be updated as new information is available. I apologize to those with slower internet connections. On the sidebar pages I have left the photos large to allow for the best inspection possible.

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (10140)	2/27/2005 2:52:44 PM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

RE: "I don't agree with the "questionsquestions" site's political analysis on all issues - it is excessively conspiratorial and distorts Mike Ruppert's work -- but on the disinformation being used to sabotage the 9/11 truth movement its insights are among the very best." Having read some of the pseudo intellectual rantings published by this pompous quack Eric Salter, it's a mystery to me how anyone would cite him as an expert on pouring milk on corn flakes, let alone anything to do with 9/11. His childish diatribes aimed at the Web Fairy would not be considered cute coming from a third grader, and are even less attractive coming from anyone out of their teens. It does make for a nice smoke screen to hide the fact that these rants are liberally seeded with claims and analysis not supported by evidence. As far as Mike Ruppert's work is concerned, it would be difficult to find any other single individual more responsible for misdirection aimed toward 9/11 researchers. It shouldn't come as a surprise that those in his organization endorse someone as flakey as Salter. The Oil Empire site serves the same end by degrading 9/11 research to the level of mud slinging. While I don't have much use for the Web Fairy site, she does have a nice collection of clips. I've always tended to view her site as a low quality, copy cat version of Jeff King's site, although with a much lower quality analysis. On the other hand, Mike Ruppert and the oil peekers strike me as being even less credible. IMO, the cause of 9/11 research would be better served by putting all the web fairies and oil peekers in a sack, where they may snipe at each other from close quarters, and out of ear shot of the rest of the world.