Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gordon A. Langston who wrote (673571)	2/27/2005 5:43:48 PM
From: jmhollen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

We need to get Rush "..on the case.." with this. I think I heared it discussed on the Mike Reagan or Mike Medved shows, but having Rush get on it would be a big help. It is one of those things that don't seemm to matter much, until some damn Developer shows up on your doorstep with a bulldozer and tells you to "..get out - or else..". At which point, if someone shot the SOB Developer - I certainly wouldn't vote to convict them.... This Developer-Government whore's land grab is a REAL PROBLEM...!!! Just like paranoid Hillary-kissing, qweer-loving NUTS trying to take away our guns and rights to hunt....!!! John :-) .

To: Gordon A. Langston who wrote (673571)	2/27/2005 6:41:32 PM
From: willcousa	Respond to of 769670

Souter is wrong that the government needs to take property to enable utilities or railroads. They all would exist viably today if government had never gotten involved. The states were well on the way to building an interstate highway system before the Federal Government took it over. Look at cellular telephones which enjoy an infrastructure built without the power of eminent domain.