Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Castle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (4498)	3/1/2005 12:52:00 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7936

But even if it was does that mean that liberals should not condemn someone who basicaly said the 9/11 victems deserved what they got? You didn't answer that. Would you care to produce the link where you condemned Duhranged?

To: tejek who wrote (4498)	3/1/2005 9:26:55 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7936

As for condemning Churchill, why bother......the right is so all over it that its overkill. You are creating a martyr. He's not being drawn and quartered. He's having people express outrage and his outrageous statements. I don't think you understand the impact of a Coulter or a Hannity. Their comments re. liberals are inexcusable. If liberals were a small minority, they might be able to get away with it. As it is, there will be a back lash. Their comments to an extent are a backlash. Liberals have been bashing conservatives every which way for a long time. Of course conservatives bash liberals too, its a 2 way street. But neither should say that the victims of terrorists deserve what they get. Also as Laz pointed out you didn't answer "But even if it was does that mean that liberals should not condemn someone who basically said the 9/11 victims deserved what they got?" Tim