Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LPS5 who wrote (10159)	3/1/2005 9:15:31 AM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

I guess the airplane's stress are the only explanation for why the WTC 1 & 2 collapsed, but still why did they collapse straight down, no resistence from building materials?!? I think there is enough doubt about how and why WTC 1 & 2 collapsed to raise serious questions. But it still doesn't explain WTC 7 falling straight down at all. After all, as far as I know, no steel frame building had ever collapsed as a result of fire before this. And, in Madrid, once again a building stood after fire for 17 hours. Same happened in Philadelphia, a 24 hour fire didn't take down a steel framed building. All in all, the who WTC collapses really reek with questions.