Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (158663)	3/1/2005 9:19:10 AM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

I am bad, but not that bad. (g) Heard on the news a few minutes that US might be entering talks with iran. We would be willing to sell spare airplane parts and join with the euros into a grand deal with iran. Of course it would be a good thing if iran didnt go nuclear in this scenario even though what they have effectively done is a form of extortion. Yesterday i heard separately that Russia has offered to become the storage area not only for Iranian nuclear waste products but for the US as well. Putin views this as a profitable business to get into and God knows they have vast uninhabited areas over there. My question is getting back to iran is whether no nuke proliferation is enough for a deal with iran? Given the very fluid and ever changing situation in the Middle East, i think that now may be a good time to get Iran to leave the axis of evil, go political in palestine and renounce all forms of terrorism thus effectively removing them as a sometimes de facto ally of al quaeda. It is far more natural for iran to be allied with Russia, Europe and the US than the Wahabi fanatics who are in charge of al quaeda. Your thoughts welcome on all of this. mike