SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush Administration's Media Manipulation--MediaGate? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jo Ellen T who wrote (700)3/1/2005 10:19:50 PM
From: SiouxPal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9838
 
I am totally guilty of loving my Home Depot. They smile well, are very helpful to me, and I'll be tearing them up tomorrow buying a load of plants etc. for my new landscape projects.
Also a woodworking guy, so they basically have it all at a good price also. I hear their employees make decent wages too.
One fellow has pictures of his whole family right on his chest. Ain't that a gas?

Sioux



To: Jo Ellen T who wrote (700)3/2/2005 5:58:59 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Respond to of 9838
 
Jo Ellen,

Thanks for pointing out that interesting example of corporations taking care of their own. I'm just now getting around to reading Jim Hightower's excellent "Let's Stop Beating Around the Bush":
tinyurl.com

The Ridge story would fit right in to that cornucopia of corruption.



To: Jo Ellen T who wrote (700)3/2/2005 9:21:47 AM
From: PartyTime  Respond to of 9838
 
Fear = Duct Tape = GOPwinger Profit!

Seems pretty evident the Bush Administration artfully used the "fear thing" as a means of coopting America's media, this to shape Bush into the "war president" image.

themorningnews.org

12 March 2003 | PERSONALITIES
Tom Ridge, You Could be the New Oprah!

Major contributors to the Republican party may be getting pay-offs in the most unexpected ways. Philip Graham considers opening his checkbook with an idea that could save the free world and literature.

I suppose it should come as no surprise to any of us that, as reported by the Washington Post, the founder of a company that sells nearly half the duct tape in America is a major donor to the Republican Party, to the tune, apparently, of $100,000 in the 2000 election. Of course. Hasn’t the Bush administration since Day One been rewarding campaign contributors from the logging, oil, and financial-service industries, to name just a few?

So just how much return did this duct-tape magnate get for his donation? Well, there’s anecdotal evidence that of the roughly 100 million households in America, nearly 10 percent bought duct tape in a rush of orange-coded anxiety. That’s 10 million purchases of duct tape. Now, you can get a FEMA-recommended 30-yard roll of duct tape at your local hardware store for about five bucks. Ten million times five comes to a whopping $50 million. But let’s be as fair as possible. Because we’re always hearing businesses and corporations whine about what narrow profit margins they have, we’ll take their complaints seriously for the moment and imagine that Mr. Duct Tape gets only a dime’s worth of profit on every dollar. That adds up to five million bucks. Starting with a modest patriotic expression of $100,000, our duct-tape donor should see something like an impressive fifty-fold increase on his initial investment.

Why is it that I can’t help remembering all that partisan carping a few years back when the Clinton White House rewarded Democratic donors with sleepovers in the Lincoln bedroom. Sleepovers? I ask you, where’s the profit in that? When it comes to generosity, the Bush White House beats them all: they come through, big time, again and again, and they never, never forget a friend.

Yet why, I ask, should all that largesse be limited to a clubby, privileged few? The circle of cronies could easily be widened, to the mutual benefit of all. That’s why I’ve decided to take out a bank loan and contribute $50,000 to the Republican Party, so Tom Ridge can recommend my latest books.

Who cares if the Bush administration daily drives me to despair with its dismantling of civil liberties, evisceration of the environment, its rush toward an ill-advised war while racking up record deficits and dividing what’s left of the Treasury among a handful of rich buddies? What are a few principles compared to raw, naked literary ambition?

Once I send in that big fat check, I expect the usual callback, the usual access accorded to such patriotic generosity, and then I’ll make my request. I want Tom Ridge to get on television and claim with a straight face before an anxious nation that my most recent novel, How to Read an Unwritten Language, is the official guide to what the Department of Homeland Security actually means when we’re told to be extra mindful during a heightened terror alert. But why stop there? I want him to continue and represent my latest short-story collection, Interior Design, as a compendium of helpful hints about what to do with all that damn duct tape everyone now has too much of.

But, you might say to me, your works of fiction have nothing whatsoever to do with homeland security. Well, no. But duct tape doesn’t do one lick of good protecting us either, so what’s your point? And don’t forget the helpful secondary use to which my books can be put: as Homeland Security Approved Anti-Terror Projectiles, in case of an imminent Al Qaeda intrusion in the foyer or breakfast nook. Each Projectile would come with an attractive official gold sticker stuck on the corner of the cover, just like those stickers National Book Award winners get. But the Homeland Security sticker could have an additional feature: a super-shiny surface that can refract enough light to temporarily blind any jihad-besotted attacker.

Now of course I don’t expect my $50,000 to get as much return as that duct-tape founder’s $100,000. I’d be more than happy if Tom Ridge merely asked only half of the households in America to buy my books. I mean, fair is fair. Even if only a measly five percent of my fellow Americans follow through, I’m looking at a summer home in Vermont – minimum. With a nice study overlooking the mountains. Where I would write even more books of fiction that Tom Ridge could pretend have something to do with protecting frightened citizens against terror.

Yet (while waiting for my bank loan to be approved) I’ve been thinking: Why be greedy? Other writers should get in on the deal too, especially the underclass of mid-list writers. It’s not like the publishing world is ever going to help out, what with advances shrinking by the day, book publicity being out-sourced, and dumber and dumber self-help, diet, and cat books filling the space that should be ours in bookstores. Really, though, any writer – mid-list or not – should be able to sidle up to the trough. We’re pretty much all liberals, and thus, pretty much all Democrats anyway: egalitarian, skeptical of the private sector, and, most of all, firm in our belief that government can indeed solve our problems.

So let’s organize, take out those loans, contribute, and wait for payback. Since Oprah has abandoned us and is now only recommending the classics (how will that help us pay a mortgage, or rent a beach house in the Hamptons?), we’ll just have to start our own book club. We can call it ‘Ridge’s Readers.’

Week by week, Tom can announce that Richard Power’s Prisoner’s Dilemma is the inside job on Camp X-Ray in Guantanamo Bay; or he can announce a new, super-duper terror-alert level that leaves the others behind: The Color Purple. He can assure the American people that the new, huge Homeland Security bureaucracy is being cobbled together with the utmost care, by referring them to Ben Marcus’s The Days of Wire and String; or Tom and John Ashcroft can declare their plan for what they think most needs to be added to the Bill of Rights: A Box of Matches, by Nicholson Baker.

Other members of the administration besides the Attorney General could get in on Tom’s act, at least if the cash-flow situation were taken care of through the proper channels. Environment czar Christine Whitman could tell us that the Bush administration’s pollution-sharing proposals for corporations are best described by Richard Burgin’s story collection Fear of Blue Skies. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld could proclaim that Randall Kenan’s story collection Let the Dead Bury Their Own Dead is the blueprint for the post-Iraq war reconstruction. Alan Greenspan could testify before Congress and confide that the key to understanding the Bush tax cuts lies in Ellen Gilchrist’s In the Land of Dreamy Dreams. Lynne Sharon Schwartz’s memoir Ruined by Reading could be recommended by none other than the Chief Executive hisself, claiming it’s the inspiration behind his decision to clip all those classes at Andover, Yale, and Harvard. And finally, even Karl Rove could try his hand at a recommendation, a book that would sum up his political career: Infinite Jest.

So my fellow writers, call the loan officer at your local bank today. With one bold stroke you can participate in the political process, increase the visibility of American literature, and nail down that Key West retreat you’ve been eyeing for so long.



To: Jo Ellen T who wrote (700)3/2/2005 12:05:18 PM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9838
 
americablog.blogspot.com

Arab Bashing Reaches Low With Thomas Slur
Barbara Ferguson, Arab News

[PHOTO}
Helen Thomas seen in this file photo from May 3, 2000. (AFP)
WASHINGTON, 2 March 2005 — Arab bashing reached a new low in Washington last week when Ann Coulter, a loudmouthed, mean-spirited, pro-Bush columnist, decided to defend the White House press pass controversy over faux-reporter James Guckert (a.k.a. Jeff Gannon) by writing in her syndicated column: “Press passes can’t be that hard to come by if the White House allows that old Arab Helen Thomas to sit within yards of the president.”

Thomas, whose Hearst column is distributed by King Features Syndicate, is of Lebanese descent. The former United Press International reporter has been a journalist for nearly 60 years, and has covered every president since John F. Kennedy. She was the first female president of the White House Correspondents Association.

Even her syndicators realized the gaffe. When Coulter’s column was posted on Universal Press Syndicate’s (UPS) website, someone edited out the race-based slur “that old Arab Helen Thomas,” using instead: “that dyspeptic, old Helen Thomas.”

But the “old Arab” reference still appears the column posted on Coulter’s website: www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi.

Coulter was, perhaps, taking a cue from the White House, which has slighted Thomas several times since 2003. During a televised news conference, President George W. Bush deliberately snubbed several reporters he ordinarily calls upon, including journalists from the Washington Post, Newsweek, and USA Today. But the most conspicuous recipient of the Bush freeze-out was Thomas, who has barbed and grilled every president since Kennedy and almost always gets to ask a question. Bush pointedly ignored her.

Bush then dealt Thomas a second slight. By custom, Thomas concludes White House press conferences at the president’s signal by saying, “Thank you, Mr. President.” Bush instead ended the conference with his own sign off, “Thank you for your questions,” and killed a decades-old White House custom. Lastly, she was removed from her front row seat, and delegated to a back seat in the press choir.

Is this treatment due to the fact that Thomas has been critical of the Bush administration? She has condemned the terror-fighting Patriot Act and slammed Bush’s domestic and international policies. She also called the Iraq war “a violation of international policy under any circumstance,” and said it is “immoral.”

But she has never been known to mince her words to any president.

There has been disappointingly little reaction in defense of their colleague by White House journalists.

In an article entitled “Lipstick Fascism,” James Wolcott, a Vanity Fair contributing editor, writes: “I wonder what would happen if a writer, say me, were to refer in a Vanity Fair column to ‘that old Jew Norman Podhoretz’ or, naughtier still, ‘that old Jewess Lucianne Goldberg.’

“Through the magic of exaggeration, I can just imagine the commotion. Daniel Pipes and David Horowitz would blow their respective lids...petitions would file in to Vanity Fair demanding that I be fired, or, for penance, be forced to tour Auschwitz with Prince Harry.

“Arabs of course are fair game on talk radio and the trash punditry, of which Ann Coulter is stringbean queen,” says Wolcott. “Presumably Helen Thomas’s very ancestry, about which I know nothing, makes her an incipient terrorist threat, though presumably commando call boy Jeff Gannon would have been coiled to pounce into action if the octogenarian made any sudden violent moves. Coulter’s typically crass wisecrack is the cartoonish version of the hostile profiling of Arabs and Muslims being conducted all over the neoconservative right, as typified by Michelle Malkin’s pioneer work to excuse the Japanese internment in order to justify the preemptive incarceration of Muslims and other suspicious elements.

“I’m sure this sort of thing doesn’t fluster them in the slightest. Conservatism and sadism have become indivisible,” writes Wolcott.

arabnews.com