Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (96956)	3/10/2005 3:32:56 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

are you really as doltish as this post implies? i tend to think not since i have actually seen you write some relatively good posts... "why post a public message and not send a private atta-boy, especially on this thread where you seldom post unless it is an invitation for comment" first of all.... my original post was to bill, i was agreeing with his statement about the WMT union vote... Message 21081906 then you injected yourself with a snarky reply Message 21083586 well ok then.... though your snarky response to me was in fact unsolicited ....meaning....i did not post to YOU...i responded to said snarky response with a substantive post!!! (i guess no good deed goes unpunished!) it is of course not my function or purpose to correct your thinking processes , therefore to persist as the exchange unfolded did, in fact become tedious to me....something which i openly expressed but again....i was not posting to you in the first place, and therefore my response to you therefore was gracious....most especially considering the all out sarcasm of your response to MY RESPONSE TO BILL! do you not understand the nature of an 'unsolicited response' ???? i did not ask for your response....my missive was to bill.....i was hoping for response from HIM.... (and of course he graciously complied<g>) so nothing weird to say at all....quite the contrary what is weird is that you do not seem to understand the dynamic of a two way conversation....the 'multipost post dialogue' only occured at the point when you interjected yourself.... clear enough?