Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ajtj99 who wrote (114232)	3/3/2005 10:20:42 AM
From: The Freep	Respond to of 209892

<<Freep, you're all about the fork and are missing the other points.>> Not at all. You're the one who put that red fork on there, and I simply pointed out that if you'd drawn it the last two times, it would've failed. Further, even when a similar fork worked for a spell, it was at a way less extreme angle. <<It's like you're getting a lap dance from a woman who measures 88-24-36, and you're complaining that one of her breasts hangs slightly lower than the other one. You're missing the big picture!>> My point was that I think it's more like you're saying that we'll go up at an angle based on the percentage of her body weight contained in her breasts vis-a-vis her left arm. Again, you added the fork, not me. I've been saying here that I think we're in something potentially very bullish due to wave counts, trendlines and other such voodoo. I'd expect note if they had a problem with my stuff, like how I had a trendline or how a wave was clearly 3 waves instead of 5. These types of things matter, don't they? the freep