Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : For the Sake of Clarity and Meaning -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (79)	3/4/2005 7:27:46 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 777

'sAlright. I posted your link to him. :-)

To: Lane3 who wrote (79)	3/13/2009 3:13:33 PM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 777

CODEWORDS: The SPJ Ethics Committee Blog Giggling about deception I rarely hurry to this blog to make an immediate comment, but I felt the need while watching CBS News anchor Katie Couric interviewed by David Letterman a few minutes ago. Couric talked about how exciting it was to be part of an off-the-record White House lunch with President Obama and several other news anchors and Sunday talk show hosts. The president told the group some things off the record and other things on background. Later, on a broadcast, you can't quote his exact words, Couric explained, but you can paraphrase him, using attribution such as "someone very close to the president - wink wink." Here, she laughed, as if the deception were funny. It's far too easy to ruin our credibility - the reason people trust us - by playing loose with the facts. Remember Judith Miller going along with Scooter Libby's charade and agreeing to call him a "former Hill staffer"? While accurate in one sense, it was intentionally misleading to throw readers off the trail of the truth. Lest we forget, our duty is to our readers, listeners and viewers. We should be judicious in granting anonymity and we should do our best to explain why it was necessary. Put aside the question whether network anchors should be letting the president go off the record in this way. Does Couric think "someone very close to the president" is truthful to her audience? Let's hope she was telling a joke that was bad in a way she didn't understand. But I also remember another Couric episode that put her in a bad light. An item pilfered from The Wall Street Journal was posted on Couric's CBS News blog. She read the piece as if she were sharing her own thoughts. Furthermore, a CBS producer had posted the item on her behalf, as if Couric had written it. Enough, please. We expect integrity and honesty from a network news anchor. Published Tuesday, March 03, 2009 3:29 AM by AndySchotz spj.org