Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (222129)	3/5/2005 12:45:27 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575399

>>>> DAMASCUS, Syria (CNN) -- Syrian President Bashar Assad said Saturday he has been taking steps to withdraw his country's military forces from Lebanon and they "should not stay one day if there is a Lebanese consensus asking us to leave." Regardless of what the Left believes, I think it is clear that Bush foreign policy is shaping up to be the most important and productive since Reagan, and may end up being the most significant in our lifetimes. The domino theory in reverse.

To: steve harris who wrote (222129)	3/5/2005 4:58:00 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575399

US draws jeers for abortion comments at UN Jeers and catcalls greeted the top US delegate to a global women's conference as she stressed Washington's opposition to abortion and support for sexual abstinence and fidelity. After withdrawing an unpopular anti-abortion amendment from a key UN document, the United States joined in approving the declaration that reaffirmed a 150-page platform agreed 10 years ago at a landmark UN women's conference in Beijing. However, top US delegate Ellen Sauerbrey drew boos from the audience, which included some of the 6,000 activists who came from around the world, when she commented on Washington's interpretation of the document. "We have stated clearly and on many occasions ... that we do not recognise abortion as a method of family planning, nor do we support abortion in our reproductive health assistance," Ms Sauerbrey said. The loudest catcalls, unusual at the world body, came when she articulated US policy on AIDS prevention for adolescents: "We emphasise the value of the ABC - abstinence, be faithful, and correct and consistent condom use where appropriate - approach in comprehensive strategies to combat the spread of HIV/AIDS and the promotion of abstinence as the healthiest and most responsible choice for adolescents." Earlier on Friday, Ms Sauerbrey said the United States was dropping its demand that the document be amended to say that abortion is a matter of national sovereignty and not a human right delineated by the 1995 conference in Beijing. After a week of closed-door negotiations at the United Nations during a two-week conference on women's equality, Ms Sauerbrey said the US point had been made and therefore Washington's amendment was no longer needed. The first version of the abandoned amendment said the Beijing meeting's final document did not recognise abortion as a fundamental right; a later version said the document did not create any new international human rights, code for abortion. "We think we have really accomplished what we set out to do," Ms Sauerbrey said. "We have heard from countries ... that our interpretation is their interpretation. So the amendment we recognise is really redundant, but it has accomplished its goals. We will be withdrawing the amendment." Despite US lobbying, public support for Washington's abortion stance was initially limited to the Vatican delegate; delegates from the European Union, Asia and elsewhere forcefully opposed it. "The text of Beijing is unequivocally clear. We should not spend hours splitting hairs over phrases that mean the same thing," said New Zealand's UN ambassador Don Mackay, speaking for his country, Canada and Australia. He emphasised that the Beijing document included a woman's right to control her own sexuality. The current UN session is meant to assess how far women have come toward equality since the 1995 Beijing conference and a follow-up meeting five years ago. Organisers seeking consensus drafted a streamlined document they hoped would be easily approved without controversy. The US amendment was seen by some as a distraction from the main goals of the conference - economic development and women's equality - but Ms Sauerbrey said, "I don't think in any way we have interfered with the flow of work." Amnesty International spokesman Alexandra Arriaga praised the US move. "We welcome the US decision to join the international consensus and affirm that women's rights are human rights," Ms Arriaga said. "What was clear was that the United States had a very specific agenda it brought to the UN and that the world unanimously rejected an effort to hijack the commission." abc.net.au