Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ask Vendit Off-Topic Questions -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandintoes who wrote (6009)	3/5/2005 8:49:14 PM
From: Walkingshadow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8752

If it were serious, don't you think AAPL with their $6.5 billion in the bank and zero debt wouldn't hesitate a nanosecond to rain down an army of lawyers all over these guys? Business is business. AAPL knows this is not necessary, and probably not even desirable. These bloggers do AAPL a PR service, actually. Why would they really want to stop that? What's the downside here? How can they lose? That's another difference between AAPL and, say, M$FT. The overinflated egos at M$FT would waste tons of money and generate nothing but bad PR by pointlessly and probably unsuccessfully going after these guys, just as a point of pride. AAPL once again demonstrates it is much more clever than to get sucked into such nonsense. Once again, I maintain AAPL management is nothing short of brilliant. It would not be wise to underestimate their genius. T