Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (10232)	3/6/2005 8:16:00 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Don > the logic behind showing photos of a plane hitting a building, as proof a plane didn't hit the building, completely escapes me. It is an extensive presentation and if you read it thoroughly you will see he makes the point that any amateur programmer could have superimposed videos of the planes on to those of the buildings. In fact, on page after page he argues that a 757 could not have made the damage that was seen, namely three small holes in the outer structure of WTC2 and a single hole in WTC1. Likewise, the damage to the Pentagon. He also argues that the aviation-fuel alone could not have accounted for the three simultaneous fireballs on WTC2. etc etc But, as I said, the article is not easy to read and, also, that it can be discarded with contempt, as doubtless many "politically correct" 911 skeptics will do. But, with respect, if you have an open mind, as you claim you do, and are prepared to think about what he says, as clearly you have not done, then I'm sure you will get his point which was not only that photos of a plane hitting the building are proof that it didn't.