Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (10234)	3/7/2005 6:28:52 AM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Ray > You are now swallowing the hologram disinformation? Crap. You didn't think about the gist of what the guy was saying. He says -- and proves 1. that the obvious damage was too little to be caused by a plane of the size of a 757 2. that the fireballs were too large to be caused by the amount of jet fuel carried He comes to no conclusion except he mentions that on the "official amateur" movies, the 757 (in the case of WTC2) could have been put in afterwards. In my opinion, the implications are that a plane far smaller than a 757 was actually used because too many people saw a plane for it simply to have been an illusion. As you know, that has been suggested about the Pentagon as well. To my knowledge, this is the first time anyone has discussed, in such depth, the direct damage to the WTC from the plane impact and also the ancillary damage to the opposing and lateral walls. It is also the first time that anyone has discussed the magnitude, cause and content of the fireballs. The relevance of the article is that you and other self-appointed authorities have no basis to decree that 757s were actually used and that, specifically, the "pod people" are disinformation agents. The whole 757 story might be nonsense?