Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (20921)	3/7/2005 5:16:45 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 21057

LOL!!! Funny. I guess I don't rate an apology for Message 17386000 It was directed at me. I notice she wants you to quit posting to her. BUT she does NOT apologize to you for ignoring your earlier repeated request to her to do so OR to Poet for supporting her "stalker". You think she can spell h-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-e? In my book, she stands convicted of that. When she convinces me she is no longer guilty, I might reconsider my own position. But we're a long way from there now.

To: one_less who wrote (20921)	3/7/2005 6:43:11 PM
From: average joe	Respond to of 21057

Message 17384933

To: one_less who wrote (20921)	3/7/2005 6:56:19 PM
From: average joe	Respond to of 21057

I don't often post to X mostly because she is about as interesting to post to as these two: Member 963792 Member 4128567 Posting to or about her is certainly not stalking. The most that could be made of her claim of stalking would be unwanted contact with an SI persona who has the liberty of ignoring your posts with the push of a button. Any competent court of judicature would throw her claim out as having no merit and award you costs for such frivolity on her part.