SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (222748)3/8/2005 3:48:32 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575396
 
"Supposedly of the U.S. troops using chemical weapons in Falluja."

I am dubious about that one. Now true, Abu Ghraib seemed like it would be impossible also, so...

Yes, but there is a significant difference between abu Ghraib and using chemical weapons. Abu Ghraib was hidden away. I can't imagine anyone in the US military would risk the use of chemical weapons making the light of day.

As an aside, it kills me that the name of that prison.......the father of Ghraib. A weird name for a prison.

ted



To: combjelly who wrote (222748)3/14/2005 4:34:44 PM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 1575396
 
These are some of the claims being made.
bellaciao.org

Even if allegedly legal riot agents were used, if they were dispersed in such concentrations as to cut off the air supply then all in the area would have died anyway of suffocation.

TP


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News