Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (10259)	3/8/2005 5:32:33 AM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Gus > Well, Ray, Don and their fellow right-wing freaks dismiss the "no-planes" theory with contempt because it doesn't fit their ideological agenda Come now, don't get nasty because I found an article which lent credibility to your "no planes" theory. As you know, I don't believe it either but I used it as a basis for discussion -- and to give the others a wake up call. Unfortunately for your theory, I have found an article which shows that an airplane engine actually fell out of the north part of WTC2 into the street below after the plane crashed into the south wall of the building. Message 21112561 And it would also appear that this kind of engine was, in fact, the kind which was used on the 737 and not the 767. If so, this opens a whole new can of worms because it would then be incontrovertible that the plane which struck the WTC was not UA175.