SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (103648)3/8/2005 8:37:22 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793820
 
Pressure

By Unfrozen Caveman Linguist

Future TV reports from eyewitnesses that Syrian and Lebanese intelligence agents have been conscripting participants for today's pro-Syria protest from villages in the north of Lebanon. Residents who have evaded pressure have also been pursued by units of the Lebanese army and handed over to Lebanese or Syrian intelligence, according to these reports. The village that Future TV focused on was Akkar (near the border with Syria), but eyewitnesses from other villages are reporting similar stories as well. As part of the same story, Future TV also reports busloads of Syrian nationals coming across the northern border to attend the Hizbullah-organized demonstration to be held in downtown Beirut alongside opposition protests.

Akkar, like Tripoli and Zharta, is one of the more pro-Syrian areas in Lebanon, so it seems a bit unusual that the government should be using such measures to convince people to attend a pro-Syria rally. If the people there are so enamoured with Syria, they should just feel that it is their patriotic duty to attend, and that should be the end of it. If this story is true, it means that there may exist substantial resistance even within the pro-Syria community in Lebanon regarding the government's chosen tactics for self-preservation. Today will indeed be a very interesting day in Lebanon.

More updates throughout the day.



To: LindyBill who wrote (103648)3/8/2005 10:09:26 AM
From: D. Long  Respond to of 793820
 
CRONKITE: I would have thought so, certainly -- if not Bob, someone else.

Oooh, burn! "Anybody but Rather", in other words...

Derek



To: LindyBill who wrote (103648)3/8/2005 2:11:41 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793820
 
Question: Cronkite himself was forced out at 65, far too soon, which was given out as official CBS retirement policy at the time. Does he blame Dan Rather for having a hand in the decision?