SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wayners who wrote (674460)3/8/2005 2:00:22 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
I'm sure CATO suggested a two rate system because they didn't believe that a one rate system would pass Congress.

Still, even with their two rate system, the vast majority of people would only be taxed @ 15%... the same as the dividend & capital gain tax rate (for those 'rich' people you were talking about...), and corporations would ALSO have a 15% rate (and with most loopholes gone, including the deduction for interest on debt! Why our tax codes encourage debt over savings or retained earnings I'll never know).

IMO, it would be a *big* improvement over the mess we have now, and I'm sure tax compliance would go way up for both individuals and corporations, and there would be much less incentive for corporations to shelter their earnings overseas like they do now.

Didn't the 15% tax rate help turn Ireland from one of the poorest countries in Europe, into the *richest* in Europe?