SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tommaso who wrote (28113)3/8/2005 3:09:15 PM
From: Henry Niman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
If you had any doubt on how clueless WHO is just read the latest on false negatives in atypical patients

news.google.com

WHO has NO idea on who is and who isn't infected with H5N1. It is clearly passing human-to-human undetected.



To: Tommaso who wrote (28113)3/9/2005 2:23:19 AM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 110194
 
Now the grandfather of the two siblings has tested positive for H5N1 and media reports are trying to blame a Feb 8 meal (siblings developed symptoms on Feb 14 and 21 and nurse around Feb 26). The report did not mention the number of breaths each took during the month of February. Multiple generations of human-to-human transmission of H5N1 is quite clear

news.google.com



To: Tommaso who wrote (28113)3/9/2005 4:31:21 AM
From: Henry Niman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
Now wife of a fatal Thai Binh case is also H5N1 positive and also asymptomatic. As I said, WHO has NO clue as to where H5N1 is and isn't (but its pretty safe to conclude that it is not only in patients in Vietnam, Thailand, and Cambodia).

The nonsense on blood pudding is over and the pandemic has clearly begun (it still needs a little more evolution to become raging, but obviously H5N1 doesn't read press releases)

news.google.com