Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush Administration's Media Manipulation--MediaGate? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (939)	3/8/2005 3:18:59 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9838

Re: If you're going to criticize this report...you need to tell us how the WTC 1 & 2 collapsed. Actually, I don't have to tell you how or when the demolition charges were set. All I intend to do is to get people who aren't fools to see things as they really are. Take a look at the two videos available on this website: reopen911.org Anybody other than the most delusional or criminal Bushies will simply note that several huge chucks of steel were hurled at a terrific velocity followed by pulverized concrete tails. This occurs regularly in demolition work, but never once in the scant history of hirise steel structure building collapse. In fact, the number of hirises that have collapsed from fire or fire plus airplane impact in the 120 year history of steel-frame construction stands at exactly three structures all collapsing on day in New York. What do you think the odds of that are? What do you think the odds are that the WTC towers came down in the exact same fashion as hundreds of other buildings brought down by controlled demolition? I'm now willing to give 100:1 odds on that bet. *** Re: If you're going to criticize this report...you need to tell us how the WTC 1 & 2 collapsed. You haven't done that yet. Here's the full report: fema.gov I don't see the onus as being on me to tell you how the buildings came down. It is enough to tell the world that the "official story" is a preposterous fairy tale and suggest that a real investigation commence. As Fire Engineering Magazine editor Bill Manning described the FEMA effort, it was "a half-baked farce". Read this, please: fe.pennnet.com And then you really must not forget WTC 7, the 47 story tower that mysteriously collapsed at 5:20 PM on 9/11/01, burying the most crucial evidence in ~2,000 open investigations being run the SEC on corporate crimes. FEMA came to the conclusion that 'no conclusion could be reached' on what brought that building down. Although a cui bono? analysis would provide plenty of tantalizing leads as to why and who brought that tower down. Here's what one excellent website has discovered about the ridiculously lame FEMA "investigation(cough)": 911research.wtc7.net This is FEMA's official conclusion about WTC 7: "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time." Huh? Say what? Orca, every "investor" on Silicon Investor knows that without some level of skepticism he/she will be wiped out by the wolves on Wall Street. Why is it that you seem so adamantly naive and sheep-like with regards to the wolves in the White House? Do you prefer to be wiped out or led to slaughter? Or are you happy that it is your neighbor's kids who are in the fraudulently perpetrated slaughter zone in Iraq?