SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_urchin who wrote (10271)3/8/2005 7:28:58 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
Searle,

Re: Is this perhaps worthy of consideration? Or am I wasting your and my own time yet again?

In brief, NO and YES.

What you need to know is that Victor Thorn and the Wing TV website is a disinformation website. Thorn is despicable. He spends most of his energy on attempting to discredit legitimate and honest 9/11 researchers like Mike Ruppert, Dr. David Griffin, Eric Hufshmid and Jim Hoffman among others.

Thorn is poison. He doesn't give a damn about lying to you.

The silly story about Ellen Mariani being the only relative of a passenger on Flight 175 is simply a lie. You really need to get yourself back to some reality based websites. You are heading off the deep end with your Wing TV and your whacko German website.

Here's the list of victims on the various flights on 9/11:

Flight 11:
cnn.com

Flight 175, second page, listing Louis Mariani:
cnn.com



To: sea_urchin who wrote (10271)3/9/2005 12:07:49 AM
From: Don Earl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
I think the site brings up some interesting points, which certainly deserve deeper investigations. Never the less, the contentions on the site are so poorly documented that it doesn't rise to the level of hearsay.

RE: "even though you have not responded to me"

I started to but decided it made more sense to delete the post. I've already explained why I think the no planes theory is nonsense, and there is really nothing to be gained by restating my view, or for that matter, criticising yours. There are a number of items you brought up, which I think are worth looking at more closely, but not in conjunction with the no planes theory.