Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (10278)	3/9/2005 8:25:23 AM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 20039

I found a quote and immediately thought of you: "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid." -Benjamin Franklin Regards, Brian

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (10278)	3/9/2005 8:42:51 AM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Gus > An ARTICLE??! You found it, eh? I'm afraid it's gonna take much more than an ARTICLE to fault my theory No, no, it's not just another article --- I found an airplane engine. A real one. Not a bullshit story. Apparently it flew right through the building and out of the other side of WTC2 after the airplane impact. And then, like a missile, it flew over the WTC Plaza, over Versey St, over WTC7, and continued north over two more buildings and two more streets until it crashed into Murray Street -- and I have a picture of the engine impacting the street sign on Murray St to prove it. There's also a picture of an airplane wheel and tyre which apparently had a similar experience. Of course, the evidence could have been "planted", as I know you are thinking, but then -- why put an engine from a 737 and not one from a 767? Ray, like you, doesn't accept the evidence of the engine either. But his reason is that the photo is blurred and also that it has been published at a "non-approved" website ie a website he doesn't visit. But with all respect to him, even though one can't read the manufacturer's details on the engine casing one can see at a glance that it is an airplane engine and that it is too small to be used in a 767.