SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : For the Sake of Clarity and Meaning -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: redfish who wrote (339)3/9/2005 9:12:02 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 777
 
I think it necessarily implies that the speaker is proud to be an American as compared to any other nationality.

I don't see that. You can be proud to be something independent of the alternatives. You can be proud to be a CPA, for example, while recognizing that, had you ended up a surgeon, you could be proud of that, too. And visa versa.

Seems to be that being proud to be something is only in contrast with being ashamed to be that something or indifferent to it.



To: redfish who wrote (339)3/9/2005 9:34:03 AM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 777
 
Nonsense. One can be proud of his/her own nationality or heritage while still respecting others.

Would you assume someone who is proud to be French hates the English?

OK, bad example. ;-)



To: redfish who wrote (339)3/9/2005 11:36:41 AM
From: one_less  Respond to of 777
 
I see your point. Those can have double meanings and may be taken rightly or wrongly to bolster or criticise a point of view, similar to the 'support the troops' issue.

I like kholt's view on it but the one that you suggested is valid also ... unfortunately.