SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Dave who wrote (7553)3/9/2005 3:10:21 PM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
I didn't see the ruling either, but it's pretty easy to get a default judgment if someone doesn't show up LOL.

The recourse would likely be if the Plaintiff tries to enforce the judgment against the defendants. They could then challenge the jurisdiction of the court issuing the original judgment in the state where the plaintiff is seeking enforcement. Problem there is that if they lose on the jurisdiction issue, they could not challenge the merits of the case. IMO.



To: SI Dave who wrote (7553)3/9/2005 3:17:30 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12465
 
Indeed, one might well wonder what judge would write:

"This Court has the authority and ability to enforce an injunction that bars the Defendants from using tortuous speech to interfere with a business interest."


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News