Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (158935)	3/10/2005 9:29:18 AM
From: Noel de Leon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

I wrote; "A little restraint was in order." You wrote; "Why?" Because 1 hour after the event no one knew why it happened. "Is it really your working assumption that US Soldiers tried to kill the Italians on purpose?" As for the US soldiers trying to kill those in the car, why don't you ask them or insist that the investigating team ask them? I doubt that they knew that the passengers were Italians(one more example of your less than honest debating techniques). Here is another example: "...agree with Eason Jordan that American soldiers go around targeting journalists?" That question has nothing to do with my comment that a little restraint is in order other than you might take some of that advice as well. By the way, who is Eason Jordan?