Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (223217)	3/10/2005 6:56:07 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571979

Remembering all those arguments made 1,500 deaths ago Why do you use the 1,500 number (US casualties) when the number of Iraqis killed as a result of Saddam's regime is orders of magnitude higher? Don't the hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of Iraqis killed as a result of Saddam's leadership of Iraq matter to you? And as I've said, I think the invasion of Iraq was a good thing, but not for the reasons GB and team gave the general public (which appears to be subject of your article).