Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noel de Leon who wrote (158950)	3/10/2005 11:29:28 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

""If the US had declined to fight WWII..."". That was Lindberg's and much of the political right's agenda in the 1930s. ""...if the US had simply bugged out of Europe after WWII and left the whole thing as a goodbye present to Joe Stalin...."" Why dont you add to the bottom "That was US stalin apologist left's agenda in the 1940s and 1950s." Fair and balanced.

To: Noel de Leon who wrote (158950)	3/10/2005 11:39:16 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

""...if the US had simply bugged out of Europe after WWII and left the whole thing as a goodbye present to Joe Stalin...."" An economic pipe dream(as I'm sure you know) as the US needed to build up Europe in order to have a place to sell it's goods, self interest at work. A military pipe dream since the USSR was anathema to US military thought. A political pipe dream since Karl Marxs writings were and still are anathema to US political thought." US had major economic interests in europe and asia pre-WW2 as well. Again lets be fair and balanced. You must be blind in your left eye. Again "fair and balanced" is all i ask for.