Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (223267)	3/11/2005 7:35:59 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576806

Bush appears to be only concerned with the sovereignty of the US. Ridiculous. If that were correct, why would he try to install a democratic government in Iraq? Duh! If you respect a country's sovereignty, you don't invade it and try to change its gov't. Not correct. Bush would probably say that the people of the sovereign nation of Iraq were being denied their freedom by an oppressive dictator, so the coalition liberated them and is currently in the process of returning their freedom to them. If Saddam has no "right" to rule Iraq, removing him isn't an attack on the country, it is an attack on his oppressive regime. Evil takes on the appearance of good for a reason. Think about it. Go talk to Mary, I never understood these fine nuanced comments from her either. Yes, I understand your view. It relies heavily on the benevolence of the invader.......IMO a risky proposition. Absolutely! You're one of the few that gets it...