Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (97561)	3/10/2005 3:44:59 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 108807

MulhollandDrive could show ee cummings a thing or two. -g-

To: Grainne who wrote (97561)	3/10/2005 3:45:23 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Gee . . . I can't quite figure out what is going on in this argument . . . some of the posts seem to be a couple of weeks old there's this number in parenthesis behind "who wrote" try that! it works really well! you can follow the line of conversation from the very first unsolicited message reply! i'm just catching up.....on old messages....busy busy!! But I have to ask--are you going all e.e. cummings with your lack or capitalization, or did you always write like that and I just didn't notice well you have been gone for quite some time...but yes i have been typing lower case for years.....i tried going without punctuation as well...but that seemed to lead to some confusion at times so i do use the occasional question mark so the reader understands when i'm asking a question... and of course here, in keeping with the feelies 'motif' copious use of exclamation points!! :)