Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (158983)	3/11/2005 3:45:15 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Thank you, kumar.

To: kumar who wrote (158983)	3/11/2005 10:14:29 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Watch your language. I wouldn't exactly agree with Scott's take on this, but given the history of this thread as a conduit for endless war propaganda, I don't find it totally out of line either.

To: kumar who wrote (158983)	3/12/2005 4:19:18 PM
From: sylvester80	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Time for the ban police to step in.

To: kumar who wrote (158983)	3/14/2005 8:42:46 AM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

You would think leftys or anti bushies dont curse given their response to your expression. In another life, I used to be a lefty and believe me it was hard to find a sentence back then that wasnt laced with obscenities. I still use colorful language when called for. Love descriptive language in answering posts from the troika of stockboy, whinny, and SiLY. Those dudes compare bush unfavorably with bin laden and consider the US a repressive police state while ignoring the plight of muslim women in afganistan or shiaa and kurds in pre-war iraq. In their world Saddams sons sleazy and queazy would be ok as successors to dad and rape a virgin a day could then become ensconsed as part of the iraqi system. Shame shame.