Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_urchin who wrote (10340)	3/12/2005 4:51:46 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Re: And, Mr Holmes, what about the fragments of the airplane (engine, wheel, windows) that I've just mentioned? Also hearsay? Fake? Film props? No, it's just too little too late... You seem to hold these fragments as irrefutable evidence that airplanes did indeed crash into the WTC but just look at the OFFICIAL "crash path" of Flight 175 into the South Tower: serendipity.li As you can see, the airliner hit the tower edgewise. So, my point is that we should expect the whole plane to break up into two or three parts and just fall down at the tower's foot. As far as Flight 175 is concerned, we shouldn't be left with a wheel over here... a pipe over there... a window here and a few bolts there!! It just doesn't make sense. It's impossible for flight 175 to have just vanished inside the south tower. 90% of the airplane should have ended up on the ground at the tower's foot. Gus