SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: slacker711 who wrote (45011)3/11/2005 2:16:36 PM
From: Jim Mullens  Respond to of 196537
 
Slacker, Re: the good Cingular news (thanks) and “I knew Cingular was going to aggressive with respect to WCDMA/HSDPA but I think I may have still been underestimating them.”

It appears from this recent DB report they may have also been underestimating their WCDMA deployments by several months (Thank goodness for VZN, and the Q’s EV-DO)

DB Wireless Industry Report – Feb 2005

Some snips from the 90+ page DB report (not Modoff) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

USA

Network. It is always difficult to anticipate what should come first, the network
(speed/capacity) or applications. Although various wireless applications might
be germinating in various labs, the absence of a robust network inevitably limits
the scope and usefulness of applications. Therefore, traditionally, network
comes first (sometimes creating a capacity glut) and applications then follow at
a later stage. The good news in the US market (as well as in Japan, Korea and
increasingly Europe) is that the service providers are making significant network
upgrade decisions. In the US it started in late 2003, when Verizon announced its
EV-DO upgrade. Although most operators felt at the time that it was premature
(indeed Cingular and AT&T Wireless did not have any concrete UMTS plans until
2008 while Sprint was waiting for EV-DV or EV-DO Rev A in late 2006/early
2007), the decision by a major carrier like Verizon had an avalanche impact.

Since then we have seen Sprint changing its mind and embarking on an EV-DO
strategy starting in mid 2004, while the new Cingular brought its UMTS upgrade
cycle from 2008 to 2006.
The only major carrier without a declared progression
path is T Mobile USA, which intends to survive on GSM/GPRS/EDGE until it has
sufficient spectrum and scale to embark on UMTS sometime into 2007-08.
Therefore, the encouraging sign in the US wireless industry is that operators are
becoming committed to very robust upgrade cycle, thus creating the basis for a
robust, data-rich platform into 2006-07.

Japan

The DoCoMo market share story is nothing short of breathtaking. Despite being the
largest wireless operator with a market share well in excess of 50%, between 1999
and 2002, the operator accounted for between 60-70% of all market growth. The
secret behind this success was i-mode and the launch of innovative handsets.
However competitors learned from DoCoMo.s success, launched similar services
(like Picture Mail) and delivered better handsets. In other words, competitors
learned how to .Outdocomo. DoCoMo. Over the past three years, its share of net
adds declined towards 45% while KDDI.s market share has risen from 15%-25% to
almost 50%. If it were not for self-induced collapse of Vodafone (Japan), DoCoMo.s
relative position would have been much worse

Indeed, one can see where DoCoMo has gone wrong. The rapid introduction of
new technologies (2.5G-3G) allowed KDDI (traditionally the .troubled child. of the
industry) to steal the march on its dominant rival. Whereas DoCoMo embarked on
an ambitious WCDMA overlay project, with untried handsets and limited geographic
and population coverage, KDDI instead adopted tried and trusted but not as exciting
CDMA progression route, starting with CDMA One and then progressing to
CDMA1X and now increasingly adopting EV-DO.
As a result, KDDI currently has
around 17m 3G (loosely defined) customers, while DoCoMo has only managed to
get some traction in the last six months and is currently heading towards 10m
FOMA (WCDMA) customers.

This has allowed KDDI to considerably close the considerably wide gap in quality
perceptions between itself and DoCoMo. In addition, the greater mix of higher-value
data subscriber in the mix has seen the ARPU differential close between DoCoMo
and KDDI. The ¥1,500 gap that existed in 1999 has now closed to under ¥100 and
our Japanese team estimates that KDDI could report higher ARPU next year for the
first time in its history.

Technology

Choose the right technology progression path. In this respect, we continue
to believe that CDMA operators have a far easier and straightforward
progression from CDMA1X to CDMA EV-DO/DV to CDMA EV-DO Rev A and
beyond than do GSM operators, which at some juncture would need to
effectively abandon GSM and transit to CDMA platform.
This clearly highlights
Verizon and Sprint. T Mobile.s spectrum limitations place this operator at a
distinct disadvantage against other major carriers.



To: slacker711 who wrote (45011)3/11/2005 5:05:46 PM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 196537
 
The key for '06/'07 is going to be the developing world speeding up their deployment of WCDMA. I'm hoping we start to see more and more articles like this as the year progresses.

business-standard.com

Surajeet Das Gupta: Move over 2G, 3G`s here

Surajeet Das Gupta / New Delhi March 12, 2005



With costs falling dramatically, new technology mobile's are finally affordable and will be available in India by the end of the year.

If you’re planning to buy a fancy PDA-phone or a “smartphone” in the near future, check whether it’s 3G compatible. If it isn’t, it will either be obsolete by the end of the year, or certainly won’t be as much fun to use.

For, five years after they first made an entrance and enticed a host of European telecom companies to bid over ¤100 billion in license fees, and then go bust, the next generation of mobile technology (3G) is finally here.

For those who want to access the net — and that’s really why you want a PDA-phone — the 3G offers data speeds of well over 2 Mbps, which is over 10-20 times faster than what’s available today on mobile phones that have GPRS facilities, or even on land lines that have what passes for broadband in most homes in the country today.

While there are already 20 million customers who have migrated to 3G mobiles (this was around six million last June), from the 2G GSM-platform globally, the state-owned MTNL has already floated a tender to four million lines of 3G equipment in India.

Market leader Airtel is currently surveying the market to see what capacity it wants to roll out with initially. By the end of next year, there could well be three operators offering 3G services in the country.


Since 3G is seen as a pricey technology in what is essentially a price-sensitive market, how well it will do on introduction will depend upon what kind of tariff plans are offered to customers, including the cost of the handsets.

While no local player has firmed up business plans as yet, no price plans can be indicated. But the European experience offers some valuable pointers on both costs of instruments as well as tariff plans.

3G-compatible handsets that cost around $700 last year are already down to around $300, and are expected to drop below $200 by the end of the year. By 2008, industry is looking at this halving.

The per line costs of a 3G network, similarly, have fallen dramatically, and are around 30 to 40 per cent higher than that for a conventional 2G network today.

But the advantage is that for the same amount of spectrum (the airwaves over which telecom signals are carried), a 3G network can carry over four to five times more voice traffic than a 2G network can, apart from giving high speed data access — the effective costs, therefore, come down to levels that are not too much higher than existing 2G networks.

In Europe, 3G service companies have been dropping voice tariffs dramatically, though in return for a certain minimum bill size per month. Packages offered to customers committing to use 1,000 minutes a month in Europe are charging voice tariffs that are around half those available today on conventional 2G networks.

As a result, European telcos are looking at getting an average revenue per user, or ARPU, which is between 25 and 40 per cent higher than of a 2G bill.

Will price-sensitive Indian consumers shift in large enough numbers to a 3G system? While there’s no doubt the market is low-value with each customer yielding just Rs 400 a month to the mobile phone companies (after deducting the licensing revenue share), around 5 to 10 per cent of customers pay monthly bills of more than Rs 1,000 per month.

Since most European 3G telcos are comfortable with customers who pay 25 to 40 per cent more than the average, this means potential 3G networks in India can bank upon a market of at least two to three million to begin with, and a lot more if they offer voice calls at a price lower than that offered by existing 2G networks.

Industry experts, however, are of the view that around 10 per cent of the existing 50 million mobile subscribers will move to 3G once it is introduced.

Over the past one year, according to data just released by IDC, non-voice revenue (basically SMS and surfing) for mobile phones grew by 139 per cent over the year.

This constitutes 5 per cent of current ARPUs and is expected to jump to 10 per cent within the next 12 months.

Another potential market that is growing by leaps and bounds today, and which could readily switch to 3G, is the current broadband Internet one, since speeds offered are many multiples of what is currently being offered.

And since the government has not allowed private providers to use MTNL/ BSNL’s existing copper lines to access customers, broadband Internet simply has to ride on a 3G backbone.

Airtel, which has an existing broadband customer base of around one lakh, says the growth is around 10,000 per month.

The only hitch right now could be a regulatory one with both GSM and CDMA (Reliance Infocomm, primarily) operators locked in a battle over allocation of the 3G spectrum.

While GSM operators argue that the 1920-1980 and 2110-2170 Mhz spectrum frequency is the global standard for 3G operations (whether by GSM or CDMA players), the CDMA operators want this frequency for their current non-3G operations.

While the telecom regulator appears in favour of granting the CDMA operators what they want, the telecom ministry has not yet made up its mind on the matter.

This decision will determine whether Indians get to use 3G or not by the end of the year.