SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: microhoogle! who wrote (28057)3/11/2005 3:32:18 PM
From: Crimson GhostRespond to of 306849
 
Merrill Lynch worried about housing bubble

Real estate bubble adds more suds
Reports notes similarities between housing and Internet boom days
Friday, March 11, 2005
Inman News

A word of caution: economic fundamentals associated with the housing bubble debate are "eerily similar" to the dot-com bubble in the late 1990s, say analysts at financial advisory giant Merrill Lynch.
In an economic commentary, "Housing Bubble Getting More Bubbly," the company compares the ratio of household equity ownership relative to GDP in the opening months of 2000 with the ratio of household real estate assets to GDP in the last few years, which now is skyrocketing toward 140 percent.
The lesson, they say, is to be wary when anything begins to approach or exceed 140 percent of GDP.
"We get nervous when we see things move parabolically north because no asset class at any time ever failed to mean-revert after such an upside move," the report notes.
Looking back to the ratio of household equity ownership and GDP just before the Internet bust, the statistics show that number falling sharply in early 2000.
There's no doubt that factors such as easier access to mortgage money, historically low interest rates, the government's push to increase home-ownership levels and the income boost in recent years have contributed to the sharp rise in the ratio of household real estate assets to GDP, the report notes.
Meanwhile, population trends, such as increasing immigration levels -- often cited as contributors to the housing surge – should also be adding to GDP. But the analysts see no reason for this to cause such a sharp rise in the real estate assets to GDP ratio.
What disturbs the analysts at Merrill Lynch is the magnitude of the shift in resource allocation towards residential real estate. They say loose financial market conditions and an increasing level of exuberance for real estate have contributed more to the housing bubble than increasing incomes.
The level of consumers who now believe housing is a good investment is at a 25-year high, according to University of Michigan consumer confidence reports. Merrill Lynch notes this "exuberance, whether 'irrational' or not."
And just because the housing bubble hasn't burst doesn't mean that it doesn't exist, the report states.
Merrill Lynch is keeping a close eye on new housing supply levels, suggesting that a backlog of unsold new homes are beginning an upward trend. According to Census Bureau statistics, the ratio of unsold supply was at 3.9 percent in October, then increased to 4.7 percent in November and reached 4.8 percent in December, a five-year high.
"It's with this inventory backdrop in mind that we were less than ecstatic to see that near-5% run-up in housing starts last month – reminds us of the 'build it and they will come' mentality in the tech space circa 1999-2000," the report concludes.



To: microhoogle! who wrote (28057)3/11/2005 3:36:29 PM
From: John VosillaRespond to of 306849
 
Make that as "Companies" who keep on giving unlimited credit to non credit worthy people deserve some culpability. Right now there is no culpability.

Didn't we just go through that exercise when the whole banking industry was deregulated and no one was held accountable for the rest of the 1980's? I have no doubt many again today are profiting big time behind the scenes. As always after the shit hits the fan then many will be hung to dry.