SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Grainne who wrote (97746)3/12/2005 1:38:30 AM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I couldn't do better than the Tao of Physics, by Fritjof Capra. Fascinating premise, really. All the illusory nature of life and many universes. The shifting between material and not material realms. Just great reading. Maybe it isn't true. Maybe it is. It certainly is much more engaging than anything I got in my religion classes.

shotokai.com

PREFACE TO "THE TAO OF PHYSICS"


Five years ago, I had a beautiful experience which set me on a road that has led to the writing of this book. I was sitting by the ocean one late summer afternoon, watching the waves rolling in and feeling the rhythm of my breathing, when I suddenly became aware of my whole environment as being engaged in a gigantic cosmic dance. Being a physicist, I knew that the sand, rocks, water, and air around me were made of vibrating molecules and atoms, and that these consisted of particles which interacted with one another by creating and destroying other particles. I knew also that the earth's atmosphere was continually bombarded by showers of "cosmic rays," particles of high energy undergoing multiple collisions as they penetrated the air. All this was familiar to me from my research in high-energy physics, but until that moment I had only experienced it through graphs, diagrams, and mathematical theories. As I sat on that beach my former experiences came to life; I "saw" cascades of energy coming down from outer space, in which particles were created and destroyed in rhythmic pulses; I "saw" the atoms of the elements and those of my body participating in this cosmic dance of energy; I felt its rhythm and I "heard" its sound, and at that moment I knew that this was the Dance of Shiva, the Lord of Dancers worshiped by the Hindus.

I had gone through a long training in theoretical physics and had done several years of research. At the same time, I had become very interested in Eastern mysticism and had begun to see the parallels to modern physics. I was particularly attracted to the puzzling aspects of Zen which reminded me of the puzzles in quantum theory. At first, however, relating the two was a purely intellectual exercise. To overcome the gap between rational, analytical thinking and the meditative experience of mystical truth, was, and still is, very difficult for me.

In the beginning, I was helped on my way by "power plants" which showed me how the mind can flow freely; how spiritual insights come on their own, without any effort, emerging from the depth of consciousness. I remember the first such experience. Coming, as it did, after years of detailed analytical thinking, it was so overwhelming that I burst into tears, at the same time, not unlike Castaneda, pouring out my impressions on to a piece of paper.

Later came the experience of the Dance of Shiva which I have tried to capture in the photomontage shown in Plate 7. It was followed by many similar experiences which helped me gradually to realize that a consistent view of the world is beginning to emerge from modern physics which is harmonious with ancient Eastern wisdom. I took many notes over the years, and I wrote a few articles about the parallels I kept discovering, until I finally summarized my experiences in the present book.

This book is intended for the general reader with an interest in Eastern mysticism who need not necessarily know anything about physics. I have tried to present the main concepts and theories of modern physics without any mathematics and in nontechnical language, although a few paragraphs may still appear difficult to the layperson at first reading. The technical terms I had to introduce are all defined where they appear for the first time and are listed in the index at the end of the book.

I also hope to find among my readers many physicists. with an interest in the philosophical aspects of physics, I who have as yet not come in contact with the religious philosophies of the East. They will find that Eastern mysticism provides a consistent and beautiful philosophical framework which can accommodate our most advanced theories of the physical world.

As far as the contents of the book are concerned, the reader may feel a certain lack of balance between the presentation of scientific and mystical thought. Throughout the book, his or her understanding of physics should progress steadily, but a comparable progression in the understanding of Eastern mysticism may not occur. This seems unavoidable, as mysticism is, above all, an experience that cannot be learned from books. A deeper understanding of any mystical tradition can only be felt when one decides to become actively involved in it. All I can hope to do is to generate the feeling that such an involvement would be highly rewarding.

During the writing of this book, my own understanding of Eastern thought has deepened considerably. For this I am indebted to two men who come from the East. I am profoundly grateful to Phiroz Mehta for opening my eyes to many aspects of Indian mysticism, and to my T'ai Chi master Liu Hsiu Ch'i for introducing me to living Taoism. It is impossible to mention the names of everyone- scientists, artists, students, and friends-who have helped me formulate my ideas in stimulating discussions. I feel, however, that I owe special thanks to Graham Alexander Jonathan Ashmore, Stratford Caldecott, Lyn Gambles Sonia Newby, Ray Rivers, Joel Scherk, George Sudarshan and -last but not least- Ryan Thomas.

Finally, I am indebted to Mrs. Pauly Bauer-Ynnhof of Vienna for her generous financial support at a time when it was needed most.

Fritjof Capra
December 1974



To: Grainne who wrote (97746)3/12/2005 2:25:43 AM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I found this article. This was particularly choice and shows why evolution and religion can be mixed, BUT only in a metaphysics class (outside the system of either science or philosophy, and into the environment in which the disciplines are commonly defined). They are different substances, and the truth only resides as a subjective view based upon the observer and his/her givens:
eb.tuebingen.mpg.de

The relation between physical laws and the occurrence of life in the universe is another crucial problem that may not lend itself to a stringent scientific solution. Life 3 could develop only because there are stars and planets have persisted over billions of years, because physics allows for organic chemistry based on the properties of the carbon atom, and because many other conditions are met, conditions by no means trivial; rather, they depend sensitively on the structure of the basic laws of physics, on the numerical values of the “constants of nature” therein, and on the initial and boundary conditions of the development of the universe, particularly with regard to its earlier stages. Is the universe habitable by chance, by design, or for some other reason? One of the conceivable explanations is the “design”-version of the “anthropic principle”: it proposes that it is a law of nature - a kind of “meta-law” - saying that the structure and numerical constants of physical laws, as well as the initial conditions of the universe, are set in a way that permits life and mind to evolve materially in the course of development of the universe. One of the interpretations, in turn, is a religious one: The universe is created by God so as to allow for the evolution of life, including that of beings that are in God’s image (in the cognitive, mental sense of the term) - human beings having comprehending and creative minds. This interpretation is not the only possible one, but it is logically fully consistent with the body of scientific knowledge that we accept. All lines of thought - be they on quantum indeterminacy, mathematical undeciability, the limits of decodability of the brain-mind relationship, or the question of how and why the physical conditions of the universe allow for the evolution of life and mind - indicate that it is possible to interpret nature and the human mind in agnostic as well as in religious terms and that both types of interpretation are fully consistent with logical thinking and scientific facts.