SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (223668)3/12/2005 4:40:15 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573920
 
>> Look at a reputable report

Reputable report?

Do you think it credible to base these kinds of allegations on three politically charged questions?

Do you think the results might have been different if, for example, the questions included questions about Clinton's horrible "agreement" with NK that ended up giving NK nukes? Or his failures to capture bin Laden? Or any of 1000 other such questions? What if they had been asked whether Bush's actions had brought about democracy to the region?

The question you ought to be asking is, "Why is there such disparity between PBS and CNN?".

Statistics can be misleading when the people who look at them are ignorant. This likely accounts for your confusion on many subjects, not just this one.



To: Alighieri who wrote (223668)3/12/2005 9:47:27 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573920
 
Al, I'm sure I can find a "study" where they ask the question, "Do you think America deserved 9/11?" Those who answer yes will be classified as looney, and those who answer no will be classified as normal.

Then I can "prove" that fewer looney people watch FOXNews than any other news channel. ;-)

Tenchusatsu