Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Palau who wrote (675030)	3/13/2005 11:09:00 PM
From: Wayners	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

So whats your explanation for the Byrd lawsuit? You don't like big deficits and you aren't saying jack about Dem attempts to kill the line item veto.

To: Mr. Palau who wrote (675030)	3/14/2005 7:51:48 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 769670

"The Reagan lawyer had more than intent. He and his GOP special interests succeeded in gutting the line item veto." I guess you could either say that, 1) Pork triumphed (as it usually does), or that 2) The Supreme Court did it's job in strictly interpreting the Constitution... and that Congress ALWAYS KNEW that it would be unconstitutional to attempt to give away some of their Constitutional authority over spending to the Executive with just a simple bill --- it would take a Constitutional Amendment to do that... just like they knew beforehand. It was just a cynical political game... pandering to some of the louder (but apparently not very well-versed in Constitutional issues) members of the public.