Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: peter michaelson who wrote (7595)	3/14/2005 1:09:42 AM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Peter it's more that he just craves attention. On the political threads before the last election he liked to show up out of nowhere and pretend he was an undecided voter. He would then demand proof over and over of everything the people whom he was seeking attention from said. I saw him pull this on more than a couple of threads. When people stopped playing his game he would just move to another thread. It took me about 3 of his posts to figure him out. The more attention you give him the more it fattens his ego.

To: peter michaelson who wrote (7595)	3/14/2005 6:17:01 AM
From: rrufff	Respond to of 12465

Wow - the shorties, who blindly followed the gurus, are upset that someone posts about naked shorting. Sounds a bit like - the accusations that touts make when they ask why someone is bashing a stock. Are they paid bashers? Instead of coming up with substance, they personally attack and attribute motivations. It's very funny. You want to prevent someone from posting. You guys censored discussion on the A@P discussion board and look where it left you. I can understand why you are so upset. As others have suggested, there may well be further connections that need to be discovered and perhaps those who wanted to dominate the boards here, back in the days of the gurus, may well be the subject of further investigation or indictment. Just a possibility. That's the only the explanation I can see for someone who is so upset when someone posts here objectively. As for posting specifics, there have been many, many posts by me and others. Yet, each time there is a personal attack. Yours is typical. I loved the frustration when that guy, who did the national ad, gave a fictitious name and was traced to a casino. The frustration of the professional hedge fund defenders was so comical. They can't attack the message so they need to attack the messenger.