Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (10091)	3/14/2005 9:53:36 AM
From: redfish	Respond to of 361839

I should hope it is Israel that does it. Iran poses no threat to the US whatsoever, their missile capability is insufficient by a couple of thousand miles to strike us, and we can destroy the entire nation at will. It does pose a threat to Israel, so it's only proper that they address the threat.

To: Suma who wrote (10091)	3/14/2005 10:06:40 AM
From: T L Comiskey	Respond to of 361839

S.. Go see......... A Very Long Engagement........... google up the site.. Intense..sweet. magical T

To: Suma who wrote (10091)	3/14/2005 10:32:18 AM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361839

Is it just me that thinks it's objectively hypocritical for us to have 10,000 nukes and for Israel to have 200-300 (that WE provided) while demanding that Iran have none? Step outside your feelings as an American and your fear of an Iranian bomb, and view it as say, an Argentinian would. I'm totally against nuclear weapons, and believe we should work to remove them from the world, to reduce their numbers to the lowest number possible. Let's lead by EXAMPLE, not bullying. Maybe if Israel agreed to destroy half it's weapons, Iran would forgo developing ONE.