Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : For the Sake of Clarity and Meaning -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (528)	3/14/2005 5:40:23 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 777

huh? That one is gonna take some figuring. But, we already have legislation ... unfortunately. That is why I am seeking some clarity away from the extreme politics of the thing. It is wrong to violate anyone's body and their choices about what to do medically with their body. It is wrong to kill an innocent human being unjustly. Lots of people lose their privacy and lots of innocent people die (in fact, all of them do). However, we are talking about targeting particular people's privacy and particular lives to be killed. If not for all the political agendas on both sides, I doubt it would be so hard to discuss this topic.

To: average joe who wrote (528)	3/14/2005 6:34:31 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 777

In any event, I don't see any interest in opening the discussion. So, I am prepared to move on. Pro-choice is a left wing standard. Pro-life is a rightwing standard. We all know the foundation of each. The extremists will call any thing short of their standard a violation of humanity and never shall any civil discussion to the contrary be held in the open. There is only one position and it exists on the side of the line you happened to land upon, whenever it was that sides were chosen ... one valid position exists and its not that other one, nor could it ever be. waddaweirld...