Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush Administration's Media Manipulation--MediaGate? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (1229)	3/14/2005 7:45:18 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Respond to of 9838

Very well said Raymond. Orca

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (1229)	3/14/2005 7:52:25 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9838

Fox News reported to TV watchdog Gary Younge in New York Wednesday July 21, 2004 The Guardian Rupert Murdoch's Fox News channel is being taken to the federal trade commission over claims that its boast of being "fair and balanced" is a fraud. Two pressure groups - the liberal internet-based group MoveOn.org and the historical non-partisan Common Cause say its news reports were "deliberately and consistently distorted and twisted to promote the Republican party of the US and an extreme rightwing viewpoint". Fox News's Irena Briganti told the Associated Press news agency that the move was "clearly a transparent publicity stunt" by the pressure groups. In a statement, the commission's chairman, Timothy Muris, indicated that the petition stood little chance of succeeding. This is not the first time that Fox's motto has met with controversy. When the liberal comedian Al Franken brought out his book Lies and the Lying Liars who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right, Fox News tried to block publication, claiming the book made unauthorised use of the slogan. The judge in that case dismissed Fox's case, saying it was "wholly without merit", and that the channel's trademark Fair and Balanced, registered in 1998, was weak. Since then Fox's request to trademark the phrase has been challenged by the Independent Media Institute, which claims the term is so prevalent as to be generic, and is "entirely misdescriptive" when it comes to the channel. guardian.co.uk

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (1229)	3/14/2005 8:17:12 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9838

During the illegal and immoral sanctions regime (imposed unilaterally by the U.S./UK and not by the UN), the U.S. murdered somewhere between 50,000 and 150,000 innocent Iraqis per year, a figure that was acknowledged at the time by Madeleine Albright as being "an acceptable cost of our policy". So then I assume that sanctions on South Africa during apartheid were immoral? For surely they would have cost more than 100,000 lives per year as practically the whole world imposed them. Brian, it is simply pathetic for you to be so ignorant of the real history of Iraq in the last 20 years. Funny, I was about to say the same of you!