Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (224030)	3/15/2005 7:04:08 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572397

re: OK, then what makes incest illegal but sodomy legal, for instance? An argument can be made for "equal protection" of both "alternative" forms of sexual intercourse, if you buy the legal Swiss army knife argument. You think in black and white, no shades of gray. John

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (224030)	3/15/2005 12:12:51 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572397

Ted, When incest becomes legal so too will boy love but not before then. OK, then what makes incest illegal but sodomy legal, for instance? Ever since a friend told me that BJs were not a form of adultery [because he was getting BJs behind his girlfriend's back], I have to ask the question........you do know the difference between sodomy and incest? If so, then you know that sodomy is a sex act...actually a couple of sex acts whereas incest is sex between family members. They are two very different things. So why ask the question? An argument can be made for "equal protection" of both "alternative" forms of sexual intercourse, if you buy the legal Swiss army knife argument. Equal protection as in sodomy vs the missionary position? Come on.....this is getting silly. Besides, this is a family thread. <g> ted